Tuesday, October 15, 2013

T-Mobile Is Killing Grandfathered Plans (Updated)

T-Mobile Is Killing Grandfathered Plans (Updated)

Following several rumors, Engadget has confirmed that T-Mobile is doing away with old data plans and forcing customers to choose from one of its current Simple Choice plans. According to a statement from the company a "vast majority" of customers will get "similar or better features at a comparable price."

Read more...


    






Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/O7WJut355eg/t-mobile-is-killing-grandfathered-plans-1445558366
Tags: demarco murray   tom hanks   drew brees   Gia Allemand Dead   Tim Hudson  

Some In Congress Have Behaved Badly From The Start


The shutdown of the U.S. government has sparked lots of finger-pointing and name-calling in Congress. But A.J. Jacobs, editor at large at Esquire Magazine, tells host Scott Simon that this is hardly the nastiest dispute in the history of our democracy.



Copyright © 2013 NPR. For personal, noncommercial use only. See Terms of Use. For other uses, prior permission required.


SCOTT SIMON, HOST:


The shutdown of the U.S. government has sparked lots of finger-pointing and name calling in Congress. But our friend A.J. Jacobs says this is hardly the nastiest dispute in the history of our democracy. A.J., an editor-at-large at Esquire Magazine - until they come to their senses - joins us now from New York. A.J., thanks so much for being with us.


A.J. JACOBS: Thank you for having me.


SIMON: Take us back now to 1798. There was a "debate" - and I put that word in quotes - between Representatives Roger Griswold of Connecticut and Matthew Lyon of Vermont.


JACOBS: Yes, it was an interesting debate, and by debate, I mean it was that Lyon spat in Griswold's face, then Griswold beat him with a hickory stick, after which Lyon started swinging metal fireplace tongs. And this fight started because Griswold insulted Lyons's virility and said that he used a wooden sword, which was quite the zinger back then. You do not insult a man's sword.


(LAUGHTER)


SIMON: Well, that's still a good policy. A cane also figured in 1856, and a very famous attack on Senator Charles Sumner.


JACOBS: Yes. This you probably remember from high school. There was a notorious attack on the abolitionist senator, Charles Sumner, by the pro-slavery congressman, Preston Brooks. And Brooks attacked Sumner with a wooden cane. Appallingly enough, this made Brooks a hero for the pro-slavery movement. So, his supporters send him dozens of canes - one of them was inscribed: Hit him again. And the broken pieces of the cane became souvenirs. So, Southern politicians wore them around their necks as necklaces. So, this was not a proud moment in congressional history.


SIMON: I guess we should note too, of course, that duels used to be held among members of Congress. I mean, I think we all remember Aaron Burr.


JACOBS: Yes. They were shockingly common. I knew about that one, but there were many others. One of my favorites was between John Randolph and Henry Clay. This was Virginia senator, John Randolph. And he said in a speech, he just went off on Clay, and said that Clay was like a rotten mackerel in the moonlight - those were fighting words. And even worse, he compared Clay to an unsavory character in the novel "Tom Jones." And that was just too much. That was one literary allusion too far. And so Clay challenged him to a duel. Luckily, as happens sometimes in duels, neither was killed. But Randolph did suffer a hole in his coat.


SIMON: I mean, not to make any excuse for duels, but it seems to me I have heard over the years that it was agreed upon that as a point of honor they had to go through with it but they agreed not to shoot too close to each other.


JACOBS: Right. Sometimes they shot in the air or the ground. And actually, Randolph had a good strategy. He was wearing - according to legend - a huge, flowing nightshirt so that Clay didn't know where his body was.


SIMON: I'll remember that the next time, you know, the next time Garrison Keillor challenges me.


(LAUGHTER)


SIMON: And tell us about a roll call in 1890.


JACOBS: Well, this is one of my favorites because it's so crazy. In 1890, the simple act of taking roll call led to a riot on the floor of the House. The Democrats were trying to block a Republican measure, and their tactics - very sophisticated - they played hide-and-seek. They decided to pretend they weren't there so that the Congress could not get a quorum. So, some hid under the desks and others tried to flee the chamber. But the speaker had locked the doors. So, they were kicking down the door. My favorite is actually a Kentucky congressman whose name was called but he said to the speaker of the House: I'm not here. I deny you the right to count me as present. Which is like a scene out of a Samuel Beckett play, you know?


SIMON: Yes, "Waiting for Congress." One last question, A.J., is there any chance that this is true?


(LAUGHTER)


JACOBS: I give it 50-50.


SIMON: OK, all right. That's bigger than I would have said.


JACOBS: They didn't have C-SPAN back then so who knows what really went on?


SIMON: A.J. Jacobs, author. His most recent book is "Drop Dead Healthy: One Man's Humble Quest for Bodily Perfection." Thanks so much, A.J.


JACOBS: Thank you.


Copyright © 2013 NPR. All rights reserved. No quotes from the materials contained herein may be used in any media without attribution to NPR. This transcript is provided for personal, noncommercial use only, pursuant to our Terms of Use. Any other use requires NPR's prior permission. Visit our permissions page for further information.


NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio.


Source: http://www.npr.org/2013/10/12/232622019/some-in-congress-has-behaved-badly-from-the-start?ft=1&f=7
Similar Articles: Presidents Cup   kate upton   TSLA   friday the 13th   Clemson University  

Tattoo (Tatuagem): Rio De Janeiro Review




The Bottom Line


A chaotic, melancholy homage to alternative theater which fizzes with the spirit of period transgression.




Venue


Rio de Janeiro film festival (Premiere Brazil)


Director


Hilton Lacerda




The spirit of Fassbinder lives on in Hilton Lacerda's Tattoo, at once an homage to the anarchist theater scene in late 1970s Brazil, a portrait of a society on the edge of change, and a punchy critique of Latin American homophobia. As drama, Tattoo tells an often-told story, but it does achieve a distinctive air of controlled chaos, managing to be both bouncy and thought-provoking in an unsubtle kind of way. Having picked up several awards in Rio, Tattoo should go on to leave its mark at festivals where the gay and the political meet. Its five Rio awards included best actor and best supporting actor.



Thoughtful, troubled Clecio (Irandhir Santos) runs an alternative theater group in 1978 Pernambuco, based on a real theater group of the time, with the end of the dictatorship still a few years away. The star of the show is the screamingly camp, couldn’t-care-less and totally immature transvestite Paulete (Rodrigo Garcia), and its content ranges from the homoerotic bawdy to the Marxist poetry readings of Professor Joubert (Silvio Restiffe). Clecio’s partner is Deusa (Sylvia Prado), with who he has a son, Tuca (Deyvid Queiroz de Morais).


Well-scrubbed young soldier Finhina (Jesuita Barbosa – the character’s name is Arlindo, but he’s credited with the feminine name his fellow recruits have baptized him with) is a victim of homophobic attacks at the barracks. Bisexual, he lives with a frighteningly conservative family presided over by the fearsome Aunt Zozima (Auriceia Fraga) and is going out with Paulete’s sister Jandira (Bruna Barros). One night Finhina finds his way to the theater and into the arms of Clecio.


As long as the worlds of the barracks (sample quote: “We respect our mothers, but we love our country”) and the world of the theater (“jealousy is the first mode of capitalist possession”) are separate, things sort of work. But the arrival of Finhina creates all sorts of problems, among them the jealousy of Paulete and the annoyance of Deusa, who wishes her son to avoid all contact with the military. Things inevitably escalate as the double standards of Brazilian society, then and now, are exposed: Lacerda’s script is careful to remind us that there is no sector of society which is exclusively gay or straight. (More radically, it also suggests that the same is true of individuals, though they might not know it.)


The plot is intercut with lengthy sequences of the shows themselves, which are a homage to the spirit of those times. Bawdy without ever being obscene, they are colorful Rabelaisian affairs designed to offer their audiences of the time a new perspective – “we bring the razor’s edge today”, Clecio explains, “so that the people will bring the grammar tomorrow”. The shows occupy close to half of the running time, which is just indulgent, but at least a variety of different moods are represented. The virtuoso close-in camerawork of Ivo Lopes Araujo does bring the viewer palpably into the action, while the hilarious lengthy final sequence, with its exclusive focus on one portion of the human anatomy, is well worth waiting for.


The sizeable cast throw themselves uninhibitedly into roles which a priori require a lack of inhibition, but the much-lauded actor Santos stands out, convincing across a range of registers stretching from the tremblingly intimate at the one extreme to gaily inserting flowers between his buttocks at the other. His is the performance which straddles the two worlds portrayed, and which is thus the emotional core. By contrast, Fininha may be the engine of the drama, but he’s an underdeveloped character whose potentially rich inner life is barely explored; Barbosa, who took best actor at Rio for his performance, struggles to prevent him from coming over as a little flat.


For the record, there is some full frontal nudity, while the sex is non-explicit.


Production: Rec Produtores Associados
Cast: Irandhir Santos, Jesuita Barbosa, Rodrigo Garcia, Sylvia Prado, Silvio Restiffe, Sylvia Prado, Deyvid Queiroz de Morais, Auriceia Fraga, Bruna Barros
Director, screenwriter: Hilton Lacerda
Screenwriter: Goifman, Jean-Claude Bernardet
Producers: Joao Vieira Jr., Chico, Chico Ribeiro, Ofir Figueiredo
Executive Producer: Nara Aragao
Director of Photography: Ivo Lopes Araujo
Production Designer: Reneta Pinheiro
Music: Dj Dolores
Editor: Mair Tavares
Olivia Brenga
Sales: Imovision
No Rating, 110 Minutos


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thr/international/~3/6VDBVVlTOhc/story01.htm
Tags: Josh Freeman   diana nyad   danity kane   von miller   emmy nominations  

Portly Taft helped usher in modern obesity care

WASHINGTON (AP) — Way before Weight Watchers or "The Biggest Loser," a president known for his girth was helping to usher in a modern approach to treating obesity.


Got a nagging doctor? The 27th president, William H. Taft did, way back in the early 1900s. A medical historian has analyzed letters between the two, complete with food diaries and daily weigh-ins surely recognizable to many of today's dieters.


Have a problem with yo-yo dieting and weight gain? Yep, Taft did, too.


Monday's report offers a rare peek at the history of obesity, through the experiences of one of the first American public figures to struggle openly with weight — and how a doctor aided in an era when physician treatment of obesity was just emerging.


Taft's "rise to political power coincided with this change in medical thinking, which led to the first celebrity weight loss patient," said Deborah Levine, an assistant professor at Rhode Island's Providence College. Her report, part of research for a book about the course of obesity in the U.S., appears Monday in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.


Sports fans might recognize Taft as the latest addition to the Washington Nationals' racing presidents. History buffs know he's the only president-turned-Supreme Court chief justice. But he's also remembered as the president whose weight, at times well over 300 pounds, made headlines.


Taft hired British dieting expert Nathaniel Yorke-Davies in 1905, four years before becoming president. Then 314 pounds, Taft was worried about heartburn and other health problems — he was famously fatigued, presumably from obesity-caused sleep apnea — and possibly also about his career, Levine wrote.


The candid exchanges between doctor and patient highlight the ups and down of weight loss.


"I feel in excellent condition. I used to suffer from acidity of stomach, and I suppose that was due to overloading it," Taft wrote at one point.


Dusting off those archives is important to remind people that obesity isn't some scary new 21st-century problem, said Dr. Scott Kahan of George Washington University and the STOP Obesity Alliance.


Yes, obesity rates have surged to epidemic levels over the past few decades. But waistlines actually began to expand in the mid-19th century, as food became easier to cultivate and distribute, Kahan said. Diet books and pamphlets began flourishing. Where women's corsets offered some tightening, Levine says obesity belts were developed for men.


Even then it was clear there was no quick fix. And if you think high-calorie restaurant food is only a recent problem, well, Taft wrote a relative that all the formal dinners required in politics sabotaged his efforts. In his first year with Yorke-Davies, Taft lost 59 pounds, Levine found, only to regain it. Only after leaving the White House did Taft shed significant weight and keep it off, with help from a different doctor, she noted.


"It's really, really hard to lose weight and keep it off. If it wasn't, we'd all be thin," said Kahan, who was struck by similarities between Taft's struggles and many weight-loss efforts today. "We recognize this problem as a disease, and yet at the same time we expect people to just be able to manage it once we write down a diet for them."


Today, doctors know that for someone who's obese, shedding even 5 percent to 10 percent of the original weight can improve health, he added.


Yorke-Davies had written a popular diet book, "Foods for the Fat: A Treatise on Corpulency and a Dietary for its Cure." He and Taft had a long-distance relationship. The doctor mailed a three-page list of allowed and forbidden foods — heavy on lean meats and reducing sugar, almost a prelude to the Atkins diet. Taft was to weigh himself daily and mail a weekly report.


Levine compared the handwritten weigh-ins and the typed letters to the doctor. Sometimes Taft cheated.


And Yorke-Davies nagged, politely, but a lot. One month the doctor fussed that Taft's weight loss was only 9 pounds, not the intended 14. When Taft slacked off, the doctor wrote that he'd heard "you are much stouter than you were a few months ago."


Levine concludes that some core practices — close doctor-patient communication, tracking weight and food diaries — still are in use.


The challenge is to find a balance between helpful advice and nagging, said Dr. Mladen Golubic of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute. Some of the clinic's patients opt for daily, personalized emails to track their progress.


"You don't want to be harsh," Golubic said. But "you need to nudge them."


Source: http://news.yahoo.com/portly-taft-helped-usher-modern-obesity-care-210440600--politics.html
Tags: david wilson   Jason Dufner   Moto X  

Monday, October 14, 2013

The Week in Fall TV: Reign Gives Mary, Queen of Scots the Gossip Girl Treatment




Image credit: The CW



There’s only one new show premiering on television this week — but it’s a doozy. The CW’s Reign (Thursday, 9pm) takes a piece of real life history and turns it into something that is so wonderfully, cynically constructed to appeal to the target audience that you almost have to applaud by the shamelessness of the entire enterprise.


The story of Reign is, technically, the sixteenth century story of Mary Stuart, better known to the world as Mary, Queen of Scots. I say “technically,” because Reign is far less an honest version of history than a version that takes as much inspiration from Gossip Girl, George R.R. Martin and Team Edward tribalism as from actual events. Sure, when Mary was a teen she was indeed sent to French to marry the French Prince Francis, as the pilot explains — but, in reality, Francis was a sickly kid who died soon after claiming the throne, unlike the televisual hunk with the equally swoon-worthy half-brother who didn’t actually exist in the real world.


That Reign plays fast-and-loose with history is hardly surprising — it is a CW show aimed at a teen audience, after all. But what’s more impressive is the way in which the series manages to successfully bring the social dynamics of contemporary teen dramas to the fictional sixteenth century and remake itself with a cleaned-up, broadcast-friendly Game of Thrones aesthetic and confused love triangle straight from Twilight seeming like an uneven patchwork of influences.


Make no mistake; Reign is something that will definitely appeal to its core audience, and doubtless many others, as well. It’s a slickly-made, fast-moving piece of television that lacks the self-consciousness of the CW’s Arrow, say, or the jokiness of Supernatural or Smallville. It definitely commits to the bit; the only problem being that there will doubtless be those who don’t realize that the actual history behind the gloss was far more interesting, tragic and, ultimately, more worthy of a television show than the version onscreen.


Elsewhere this week: For those who enjoy the watchable procedural fluff of the USA network, this is a great week — both White Collar and Covert Affairs return on Thursday (9pm and 10pm, respectively). Beautiful people making dull quips while solving impossible problems in an hour has rarely been such fun.



Source: http://feeds.wired.com/c/35185/f/661469/s/3274686b/sc/38/l/0L0Swired0N0Cunderwire0C20A130C10A0Cthe0Eweek0Ein0Efall0Etv0Egame0Eof0Ethrones0Egossip0Egirl0Ereign0C/story01.htm
Tags: will smith   indicted  

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Alt-week 10.12.13: water found in deep space, lonely planets and Juno's fly-by

Alt-week takes a look at the best science and alternative tech stories from the last seven days.





If this week's gaggle of science news gives you a neck ache, we apologize. That's because we're fully up amongst the stars, with three different tales of astronomic endeavor. Water-bearing space ...


Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/OwGfNDQ6YFk/
Category: mrsa   wes welker   penn state football   9/11 Pictures   ryan braun  

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Tennessee GOP chairman accuses ACLU of 'scare tactics' on football game prayer issue

Tennessee Republican Party Chairman Chris Devaney
Tennessee Republican Party Chairman Chris Devaney






















Poll


Should prayer be allowed before high school football games?









NASHVILLE — State Republican Party Chairman Chris Devaney is accusing the American Civil Liberties Union Tennessee of using “scare tactics” to “intimidate” public schools on the issue of prayer at high school football games.



After the ACLU-Tennessee last week sent a letter to school superintendents warning about reports of “school-sponsored prayer in numerous” football programs, Devaney today fired off his own letter to the superintendents, calling the ACLU a “far left” organization.



He also says he’s started a petition.



“With a new week of football games set to kick off, we write today to tell you we stand with you and the millions of Tennesseans who want to express their rights and not cower to the liberal self-interests of a leftwing organization,” Devaney says in the letter.



He charges the ACLU-Tennessee letter “misses a very basic principle about the First Amendment: It was written—not to protect government from religion—but to ensure religious freedoms are not violated by the government.”



Moreover, Devaney said, the ACLU-TN willfully misrepresents a point in the U.S. Supreme Court case Sante Fe Independent School District v. Doe case it cites. The Court has found "(n)othing in the Constitution…prohibits any public school student from voluntarily praying at any time before, during, or after the schoolday," Devaney said.






Last week, ACLU-Tennessee Executive Director Hedy Weinberg announced the organization had sent a letter to superintendents in response to what she said were reports of school-sponsored prayer.



“Our experience is that many public school administrators and educators struggle with how the constitutional guarantees of religious freedom apply to prayer during their school-sponsored events,” she said in a news release at the time. “Our goal is to make sure that school systems statewide understand these First Amendment guarantees and commit to protecting religious freedom for all students, including athletes, and for their families who attend the games.”



The ACLU-TN letter went out to explain the U.S. Supreme Court held in Lee v. Weisman that school faculty, coaches, administrators and invited clergy may not lead students in prayer or conduct a prayer during a school event.



She said that in regard to the specific practice of prayer at public school football games, the Supreme Court established in Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe that a Texas school district policy permitting its student body to vote at the beginning of each school year whether or not to have prayers before football games also violates the Establishment Clause.



But in her actual letter to superintendents, Weinberg said “contrary to protests voiced by those who desire to use the public schools as a forum for promoting their particular religious beliefs, the Supreme Court’s holding in Sante Fe is not anti-religious and does not interfere with the rights of students, guaranteed by the Free Exercise Clause, to worship and pray according to the dictates of their own consciences.”



Absence of school-endorsed prayer from a public school’s athletic event “does not impose any burden on the ability of students to personally affirm their religious beliefs,” she wrote.

















about Andy Sher...



Andy Sher is a Nashville-based staff writer covering Tennessee state government and politics for the Times Free Press. A Washington correspondent from 1999-2005 for the Times Free Press, Andy previously headed up state Capitol coverage for The Chattanooga Times, worked as a state Capitol reporter for The Nashville Banner and was a contributor to The Tennessee Journal, among other publications. Andy worked for 17 years at The Chattanooga Times covering police, health care, county government, ...






Source: http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2013/oct/10/gop-chairman-accuses-aclu-scare-tactics-issue-pray/
Tags: Ed Sheeran   Big Brother 15   Chelsea Manning   H&m   cote de pablo