How poor is poor? How rich is rich?

Everyone from the US Census Bureau to the United Nations has a definition of poverty. A reasonable income is unquestionably important. But income alone doesn't determine whether someone is poor. Or rich.?

By John Yemma,?Editor / October 7, 2012

Jay Hiner creates giant bubbles with a homemade wand and a nontoxic solution at Cheney Lake in east Anchorage, Alaska.

Erik Hill/The Anchorage Daily News/AP

Enlarge

What defines a poor person??

Skip to next paragraph John Yemma

Editor, The Christian Science Monitor

John Yemma has been a foreign correspondent, Washington reporter, political editor, and has covered economics, science, and culture in 38 years as a journalist. He has worked for The Dallas Morning News, The Boston Globe, UPI, The San Antonio Express-News -- and since 2008, he has been Editor of the Monitor. The Monitor?publishes international news and analysis at CSMonitor.com, in the Monitor Weekly newsmagazine, and in an email-delivered Daily News Briefing.?

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

The US Census Bureau, federal agencies, state governments, the United Nations, and economists all set different numbers. But the poverty line is as individual as the people it defines. Circumstances vary, geography is a factor, family and community play a role, and everybody makes choices.?

To be poor in Central Asia or western Africa is not the same as being poor in London or Appalachia. In some cases it is better, and in some cases it is worse. ?Living simply can make a person look poor to a statistician, but is that real poverty??(See Jina Moore's excellent Monitor Weekly cover story --?click here -- unpacking poverty.)

You could ask the same questions about wealth as as about poverty. In Tom Wolfe?s satire on 1980s-era New York, ?Bonfire of the Vanities,? the protagonist runs through his budget and shows how a $1 million salary is not enough to support his lifestyle. By most of the world?s standards, this ?master of the universe? is clearly wealthy. Outside his Manhattan cocoon, he would be rich. But he feels poor.?

He suffers from a problem that money can?t solve: poverty of spirit. In other words, he is unhappy. So here?s a corollary to our cover-story question: What defines a happy person? It?s one thing to achieve basic needs, another to feel comfortable, but how much money is needed to feel happy?

You probably have a common-sense view that echoes these truisms: We all need money. But money isn?t everything. Would it surprise you to learn that social scientists have actually proved those truisms true?

According to a 2008-09 study of 450,000 Americans by researchers at Princeton University, more money doesn?t just help the poor live better lives; it helps them feel better about life. ?The pain of life?s misfortunes, including disease, divorce, and being alone, is exacerbated by poverty,? the authors write.?

Increased incomes improves the conditions of the poor. But only up to a point. Above $75,000, money does not produce commensurate happiness. Chasing higher and higher income actually decreases your quality of life.

That?s because the quest for money and material comforts appears to shut off other forms of enrichment ? family, friendships, hobbies, intellectual and spiritual pursuits, appreciation of nature. ?The price of anything,? that guru of simplicity, Henry David Thoreau, wrote, ?is the amount of life you exchange for it.?

The diminishing returns of wealth don?t just affect individ-uals. A 2010 report published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that, over the long run, happiness does not increase as a country?s overall income increases. In Greece and other economically hard-hit countries, unhappiness has soared ? to the point of rioting ? as income has plummeted. But examined over a period of 10 years or more, a nation?s gross domestic happiness is independent of rising income.

There?s still more happiness research detailed in a soon-to-be-published book titled ?Happy Money: The Science of Spending,? which indicates that more money makes you happy only if you use it to buy yourself time or experiences or spend it on others.

So here?s the takeaway from our social scientists: Poverty is bad. Breaking people out of it is enormously important. But poverty is also a state of mind. As is affluence. More money makes people feel better, but only up to a point. Real happiness is tied to appreciation, to deeper pursuits, and to helping others.

Or you could say: Money isn?t nothing. Nor is it everything.

But you already knew that.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/slQaUZ6r020/How-poor-is-poor-How-rich-is-rich

lehigh walking dead season finale matt flynn denver news frozen planet creighton new smyrna beach